Why have WE NOT Prevented/Cured Type 1 Diabetes?
1. Sub-optimal trial designs (dose/power/populations);
2. Treating too late / lack of stage specific interventions;
3. Treating “just” the immune response;
4. Failure to use drugs in combination;
5. Performance of trials with questionable rationale;
6. Lack of informative biomarkers;
7. Not knowing the role of environment in in T1D;
8. Failure to appreciate disease heterogeneity;
9. Failure to understand the disorder pathogenesis.
The role of
Technology in Type 1 Diabetes Beyond the Pandemic @ChantalMathieu
1. 1. Insulin therapy remains challenging in people
with Type 1 Diabetes;
2. Glucose variability, risk of hypoglycemia,
weight gain and overall disease burden remain issues in those living with T1D;
3. Patient education and coaching, better insulins
and novel technologies are helping people with T1D
Digital
Diabetes Emergencies @IrlHirsch
·
Hypoglycaemia and DKA remain major emergencies
in the treatment of T1D and current technology and forms of glucagon has not
resulted in a reduction;
·
Sick-day management and home-treatment of DKA
continues to require preparation, no matter if care is virtual or not;
·
Newer technologies such as CGM (Continuous
Glucose Monitoring) and new apps to assist with vital signs may be helpful for
the digital management of the acute hyperglycaemic crisis.
Using Digital
Health Technology to prevent and treat Diabetes @NealDavidKaufman
·
High health literacy patients show higher
levels of patient activation than those with low health literacy;
·
The effectiveness of social media-based Health
literacy- sensitive diabetes self-management.
·
Thus social media-based self-management
interventions accommodating low health literacy have the potential to help
overcome disadvantages associated with low health literacy;
·
Interventions based on providing extra
messages, even in context of clinical care, may not be able to change long-time
habits and behaviors required to improve outcomes, as was found out on a study to enhance patient activation and
self-management activities in patients with type 2 diabetes
·
Digital therapeutics deliver evidence based
therapeutic interventions to patients that are driven by high quality software programs
to prevent, manage or treat a medical disorder or disease.
Technology and
Pregnancy
·
In pregnancy, Real-Time Continuous Glucose
Monitoring (CGM) has been shown to improve neonatal outcomes.
·
CGM gives a detailed picture of maternal glycemic control throughout pregnancy. However, summary CGM measures do not
capture daily glycemic excursions and patterns.
·
Regular CGM use is associated with improved
metabolic control
Metformin in
Pregnancy-Long term follow up:
·
Children exposed to metformin had more
subcutaneous fat;
·
Children
exposed to had slightly higher fasting glucose;
·
There was a possible trend towards higher
systolic blood pressure and lower LDL cholesterol level;
·
Children
exposed to metformin were heavier;
·
Metformin exposed children had higher BMI and
increased prevalence of overweight/obesity;
·
At 9 years of age, metformin exposed children
have higher readings for measures such as weight, arms and waist
circumferences, BMI, triceps skinfold and abdominal fat volume.
Should all
pregnant women with diabetes take metformin during pregnancy? @DeniceFeig
Metformin
has beneficial effects in mothers and infants of women with diabetes.
·
Metformin improves maternal and neonatal
outcomes in women with gestational diabetes and type 2 diabetes;
·
Metformin is associated with better patient satisfaction;
·
The preponderance of evidence suggests
metformin is safe in the long-term;
·
Metformin should be offered to all women with
diabetes.
Factors
associated with stillbirth in women with diabetes:
What
is modifiable?
- 1.
Deal with reversible risk factors:
- ·
Smoking;
- ·
Obesity/ overweight between pregnancies;
- ·
Ketosis (a serious diabetes complication where
the body produces excess blood acids/ketones) in pregnancy;
- ·
Glycaemia
Diabetes
and Sport
Monitoring
the elite athlete with type 1 @MichaelRiddell
·
For almost 100 years, many people with Type 1
Diabetes have been pushing the boundaries of what is possible in sport;
·
Developments in technology have helped athletes
to reach their sporting goals;
·
CGM and emerging AID systems appear to help
with glucose control but sensor lag may be an issue;
·
Novel data displays are helping athletes to
better understand the relationships between exercise and glycaemia.
Nocturnal
Post-Exercise Strategies
1.
Adults with Type 1 Diabetes should perform a
scan at least once intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) during the nocturnal period due to the increased
risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia;
2.
Family/friends can be alerted using the remote
monitoring function, which can support to avoid (severe) nocturnal
hypoglycaemia;
3.
Different types and intensities of exercise
result in different glucose responses during and after exercise;
4.
Different groups of people with T1D require
different glucose targets based on “exercise experience” and risk of
hypoglycaemia (use assessment tool);
5.
Check glucose as often as possible during
exercise (10 minutely);
6.
Using both, the actual sensor glucose level and
accompanied trend arrow improves glycaemia around exercise;
7.
Defining individual carbohydrate intake at a
glycaemic threshold based on trend arrows ameliorates glucose levels during
exercise.
Advanced
Therapeutic Approaches in Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes
Outcome Trials: Current Status @Jay.S.Skyler,MD,MACP
1.
Dapagliflozin
Indications:
·
In patients with type 2 Diabetes, to improve glycaemic control;
·
In patients with T2D with either eCVD or
multiple CV risk factors, to reduce the
risk of hospitalisation for heart failure;
·
In patients with heart failure with reduced
ejection fraction, to reduce the risk of
CV death and hospitalisation for heart failure;
·
In patients with CKD at risk of progression, to reduce the risk of sustained eGFR
decline, ESKD, CV death, and hospitalisation for heart failure.
2.
Dulaglutide
Indications:
·
In patients with T2D, to improve glycaemic control;
·
In adult with type 2 diabetes mellitus who have
established cardiovascular disease or multiple cardiovascular risk factors, to reduce the risk of major adverse
cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial
infarction, or nonfatal stroke)
3.
Semaglutide
Indications:
·
In patients with T2D, to improve glycaemic control;
·
In adult with type 2 diabetes mellitus and
established cardiovascular disease, to
reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events.
4.
Liraglutide
Indications:
·
In patients with T2D, to improve glycaemic
control;
·
In adult with type 2 diabetes mellitus and
established cardiovascular disease, to
reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events.
5.
Empagliflozin
Indications:
·
In patients with T2D, to improve glycaemic
control;
·
In adult with type 2 diabetes mellitus and
established cardiovascular disease, to
reduce the risk of cardiovascular death.
Terzepetide:
Comparison to an Ideal Drug to Treat Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus @StevenMissen
·
High efficacy at lowering HbA1c;
·
Low incidence of hypoglycaemia;
·
Weight loss, not weight gain;
·
Good tolerability;
·
Convenience of administration;
·
Benefits on important endpoints such as
cardiovascular morbidity/mortality
New Insulins,
Biosimilars and Insulin Therapy:
1.
Studies with novel supra-long-acting Insulin
show that this has similar glucose-lowering effectiveness and comparable rates
of hypoglycaemia versus glargine U100 in insulin-naïve adults with type 2
diabetes
2.
The main findings of the two (glargine U300
& degludec) randomised controlled head-to-head trials, the clinical
effectiveness and safety of glargine U300 and degludec in adults with T2D
appear to be largely equivalent
Smart
Insulins: A lot of smoke with a little fire @LutzHeinemann
Smart
microneedles with porous polymer layer for glucose- responsive insulin delivery
3.
Ultra rapid lispro (URLi) lowers postprandial
glucose and more closely matches normal physiological glucose response compared
to other rapid Insulin analogues
4.
Biosimilar Insulin are a potential to reduce
healthcare costs, especially in view of the high insulin prices across the
world.
Decision
Support systems and closed-loop @BorisKovatchev
5.
Fully closed-loop Insulin delivery using either
faster or standard Insulin Aspart is safe and efficient in achieving
near-normal glucose concentrations outside postprandial periods. The
closed-loop algorithm was better adjusted to the standard Insulin Aspart.
Impact of
COVID-19 Pandemic on Diabetes:
1.
COVID-19 mortality is higher with diabetes and
there may be associations with gender;
2.
The data are mixed with the association between
outpatient glycaemic control and mortality in Type 2 diabetes;
3.
The totality of evidence suggests that RAAS (Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System)
inhibitors either have no effect or may be beneficial to COVID-19 outcomes;
4.
Data for COVID-19 infection use of metformin is
mixed but does not appear to be harmful. Beneficial effects may be related to
gender and other clinical confounders;
5.
The interesting theoretical reasons dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors
may improve outcome and as now they appear to be safe and may be beneficial;
6.
It does not appear Sodium-glucose Cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors will be effective
for the treatment of COVID-19;
7.
Telemedicine has come a long way in the past 15
months, but there still challenges that are needed to be addressed.
Covid-19 And
Management of Patients with Diabetes: How to implement Scientific Knowledge to
Clinical Practice?
1.
Optimal control of blood sugar and blood
pressure. Strive to continue oral antidiabetic and antihypertensive medication
(DPP4 inhibitors and metformin possibly protective);
2.
Insulinisation if the course of disease is
severe;
3.
Intensive blood sugar monitoring in patients
with Dexamethasone (also Budenoside);
4.
Follow-up monitoring after COVID-19 infection:
metabolism, neurostatus, foot findings, vascular status, heart, kidneys, lungs.
How to manage
Type 2 Diabetes and obesity during the COVID-19 pandemic @Prof_Cerrillo
1.
Hyperglycaemia admission and during hospital
stay are independent risk factors for mortality in high risk cardiac patients
admitted to an intensive cardiac care unit;
2.
Higher glycaemic variability within the first
day of ICU admission is associated with increased 30-day mortality in ICU
patients with sepsis (recent publication
on Glycaemic variability);
3.
Obesity is a key risk factor for a very bad
prognosis for COVID-19;
4.
Type 2 Diabetes is associated with higher death
rate, but type 2 diabetes persons with better controlled blood glucose die at a
lower rate than those with poorly controlled blood glucose;
Glycaemic
variability is an integral component of glucose homoeostasis. Although it is
not definitely confirmed as an independent risk factor for diabetes complications,
GV can represent the presence of excess
glycaemic excursions and, consequently, the risk of hyperglycaemia or
hypoglycaemia. GV is currently defined by large and increasing number of
metrics, representing either short-term (within-day and between-day
variability) or long-term GV, which is usually based on serial measurements of
HbA1c or other measures of glycaemia examining the association between GV and diabetes-related
complications, as well as non-pharmacological and pharmacological strategies
currently available to address this challenging aspect of diabetes management.
Practical
Implementation of Diabetes Technologies overcoming barriers in the Real-World
·
Improving payer coverage is essential to “level
the playing field”
·
Not sufficient to address: implicit provider
biases; and access to specialty care.
·
Glucose monitoring technologies may be a key:
Quicker diffusion across Socioeconomic status (SESL levels; and Impact on
outcomes, both glycaemic & economic.
·
Essential to continue work to equalise
opportunities for people with diabetes (policy, organisational, community,
personal level).
Primary Care
and Diabetes Technologies and Treatments @Gregg.D.Simonson
·
Patients treated with Metformin and
Sulphonylureas (SU) have higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events
(MACE), severe hypoglycaemia and all-cause mortality;
·
SU should not be 2nd line therapy
for most patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus;
·
GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors
should be considered 2nd line therapy.
·
Consider adding GLP-1 receptor agonists for
patients on basal insulin, especially those with severe hypoglycaemia.
Updates on
NAFLD/NASH And Diabetes:
1.
NAFLD is “prevalent” in Type 1 Diabetes, but
numbers are depending on:
·
Screening methodology (5-8% using MRI- 22-27%
using US)
·
Referral bias
2.
Need for an accurate diagnostic algorithm;
3.
Visceral fat accumulation and insulin
resistance are strongly associated with NAFLD in Type 1 Diabetes;
4.
Type 1 Diabetes patients with NAFLD have a
higher incidence of:
·
Cardiovascular disease
·
Microvascular complications
NAFLD/NASH in
metabolic syndrome and early type 2 diabetes @ChrisByrne
·
Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is a
multi-system disease with implications beyond the liver;
·
NAFLD represents a wide spectrum of liver
diseases that is strongly associated with Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) that
increases risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Cardiovascular disease, Chronic Kidney
Disease (CKD) and certain cancers;
·
The aetiology of increased risk of CVD is
complex but the atherogenic dyslipidaemia is important;
·
Treatment with pioglitazone and/ or
Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists is effective in patients with
early T2DM and NAFLD
Psycho-educational
interventions to improve glycaemic control in adults with type 2diabetes
@SimonHeller
1.
Many (most) individuals currently struggle to
implement and sustain effective diabetes self-management;
2.
Altering lifestyle and self-managing type 2
diabetes successfully requires major changes in behaviour and acquisition of
skills;
3.
Structured education/training:
·
is more effective than unstructured and adhoc
education and produces small but clinically relevant improvements in HbA1c;
·
is undertaken by a small fraction of those with
diabetes in the UK;
·
probably needs underpinning by structured
support, technology and addressing key self-management behaviours.
4.
The major need is to ensure that structured
education is not only offered but undertaken.
Social Media:
In the Sea of Voices- Where Is the Lighthouse?
Harnessing the
Power of Social Media and Peer Support @KellyClose
·
The jury is now on the impact of social media
on patient outcomes- it provides helpful
peer support and engagement.
·
There are concerns with social media for
companies, HCPs, and patients. But there are also lots of best practices and guidelines made by experienced groups.
·
Patients trust
their HCPs far more than the information they find online, and even
so- HCPs will still find themselves in the position of being asked to curate the information patients find.
·
The DOC is not tightly regulated-positives and
negatives to this. It allows for flexibility and autonomy and opportunity like
insulin 100 from University of Toronto, like patients supporting each other,
like reducing stigma. While it also brings up privacy concerns and the
potential for misinformation, this is a solvable problem- or at least an
addressable one!
Using Social Media
to bridge the Social Distance in a Pandemic @DrRoseStewart
1.
Using agile and accessible communications
platforms to convey messages from credible sources can help contain anxiety
during emergency situations;
2.
Providing mass education via social media is a
significant paradigm shift and may help make education more accessible;
3.
Delivering an equivalent level of support
long-term will require funding.
What should we
be saying to people with T2 who want to use social media?
·
Find a site that’s right for you
·
Watch and wait
·
No-one’s diabetes is the same
·
Don’t believe everything you read
·
Only share things you’d share with a stranger you’d
just met
·
Try to be polite and helpful- if you’ve nothing
good to say, don’t say it
·
If you are feeling bullied- block or report
people
·
If using social media isn’t helping you with
your diabetes, but is making you more stressed or upset- STOP.
Improvements
in Time-In-Range and other Diabetes Related Health Metrics @PratikChoudhary
1.
Flash glucose monitoring has been a game
changer just like SMBG was 40 years ago
2.
For people with diabetes, it has:
·
Improved quality of life
·
Given them freedom
·
Improved diabetes control
3.
For HCP and health care system:
·
Reduced admissions / Emergency call outs
·
Over time- reduced admissions
·
Facilitated remote care and telemedicine
Optimising
HbA1c levels & Glycaemic control with Flash Glucose Monitoring @Monika
Kellerer
·
Many T2D patients do not achieve their glycemic goals;
·
Flash Continuous Glucose Monitoring replace
SMBG and results in significant and persistent HbA1c- Reduction, less hypoglycemia, more Time-In-Range (TIR) and higher treatment satisfaction in
T2D with and without insulin;
·
More TIR correlates with less all cause and
cardiovascular mortality in T2D’
·
CGM may also serve as modification tool for
healthier behavior;
·
Flash CGM is associated with significantly less
acute diabetes events and hospitalisation in T2D;
·
Continuous Glucose monitoring will be
increasingly used in T2D who do not reach their targets.
·
Hachioji suggested “Observe due measure, for
moderation in all things”. Recognition that there was a lower limit to
normality.
Heart failure
in Type 2 Diabetes- early identification and interventions for improving
patient outcome
HF in T2D:
perspectives from a diabetologist and a cardiologist @AntonioCeriello
Why and how to
screen for heart failure in diabetes?
·
Heart failure is a very frequent complication
of diabetes and is asymptomatic for a long time. Heart failure exposes people
with diabetes to serious fatal cardiovascular events.
·
Screening for heart failure in people with
diabetes is today mandatory because we now have very good tools to prevent
worsening of the situation.
Major
causes of Heart failure in patients with diabetes:
·
Coronary artery
disease;
·
Hypertension;
·
Chronic kidney
disease;
·
Lower extremity
atherosclerotic disease;
·
Long duration
of diabetes;
·
Aging;
·
Increased body
mass index (BMI)
NB. LV (Left ventricular)
dysfunction is frequent in both pre-diabetes and overt diabetes, and severity
correlates with insulin resistance and the degree of glucose dysregulation.
Time to act-
SGLT2 inhibitors in HF @MarkPetrie
·
SGLT2 (Sodium-glucose transport protein 2)
inhibitors prevent HF hospitalisations in patients with diabetes and CVD or
multiple risk factors;
·
SGLT2 inhibitors reduce HF hospitalisations and
CV death in patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF)
with and without diabetes;
·
SGLT2 inhibitors reduce HF hospitalisations in
patients with CKD with and without diabetes.
HF in T2D:
perspectives from a diabetologist and a cardiologist @ShelleyZieroth
·
T2D and HF are directly linked;
·
There is an urgent to diagnose and intervene to reduce risk in both T2D and HF;
·
Educate and empower and our colleagues and
patients to prevent and treat heart failure;
·
Collaborations across disciplines will improve patient
outcomes.
Comments
Post a Comment